Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2013Nu52003 (2014.07.01)
Case Number of the previous trial
Seocho 2013west 1926 (O1, 2013)
Title
If the serviced services did not know that the serviced business is subject to taxation, it does not constitute justifiable grounds.
Summary
The evidence presented alone is insufficient to acknowledge that there is a justifiable reason to believe that the Plaintiffs could not have caused the failure to perform their duties, such as where it is unreasonable to expect the performance of their duties. Even if the Plaintiffs were to know that the lease of the instant building was a house lease, it is merely a mistake of fact or a law’s site.
Cases
2014du40326 Disposition of revocation of Disposition of Imposing Additional Value-Added Tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
ParkA and 121 persons
Defendant-Appellee
O Head of tax office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2013Nu52003 Decided July 1, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
November 27, 2014
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal concerning the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided