The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. 원고의 주장 원고는 피고들과 사이에 서울 서초구 F 소재 건물 지층 일부 63㎡에 관하여 임대차계약을 체결하고 ‘G’라는 상호로 영업을 하고 있는데 원고의 점포는 위 건물 측면 외진 곳 지하에 위치하고 있어 간판이 눈에 잘 보이도록 위 건물 중 별지 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 (가)부분에 간판을 설치할 필요가 있다.

The Defendants, a commercial rental, did not have a duty to install a signboard at the above location they want.

The plaintiff suffered business losses due to reasons that the plaintiff did not install the signboard and did not run the business. Since the defendants are liable to compensate for such losses, the defendants are liable to pay to the plaintiff the money as stated in the purport of the claim.

2. According to the reasoning of the evidence No. 1-1 and No. 2 of the judgment, the Plaintiff and the Defendants concluded a lease agreement with respect to a part of 63 square meters of a branch of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building underground floor with respect to the lease term of 63 square meters from April 16, 2018 to April 16, 2023, and the Plaintiff is running a business in the name of “G” in the said place. However, under the instant lease agreement, it is recognized that the Defendants are obliged to install a signboard at the location that the Plaintiff wants.

The Defendants cannot be deemed to have a duty to cooperate or to cooperate with the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to recognize that the Defendants failed to perform their obligations under the commercial building lease agreement to cause business losses to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the above argument of the plaintiff, which is premised on the plaintiff's duty to install a signboard at the above location the plaintiff wants, is without merit without further review.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants shall be dismissed in its entirety as there is no reasonable ground.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.