logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.15 2015나982
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person operating Smarket in the name of “G” as referred to in 123 within the F shopping mall located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E (hereinafter “instant shopping mall”); Defendant B is a general secretary of the instant shopping mall; Defendant C is the chairperson of the instant shopping mall; and Defendant D is a person who was or was working as the head of the management office of the instant shopping mall.

B. On July 2012, Dobong-gu, upon the application of the shop owners of the instant commercial building, selected the instant commercial building as the subject of subsidization for the improvement of signboards and subsidized KRW 40 million.

C. Around August 2012, shop owners of the instant commercial building organized a signboard improvement resident committee consisting of Defendant C as the chairperson and Defendant D vice-chairperson, and implemented the signboard improvement project of the instant commercial building from September 2012 to December 2012. As a result of the said improvement project, a total of 173 signboards attached to the total of 70 stores of the instant commercial building and a total of 70 signboards were removed, and a total of 70 signboards were newly attached to one store.

(However, three signboards, including the plaintiff's stores, have good condition and their shop owners, including the plaintiff, did not replace them with a new signboard with the permission of Dobong-gu.

The Plaintiff’s store is located on the rear side of the instant commercial building, and due to the said signboard improvement project, two signboards, other than the signboards attached to the rear side of the instant commercial building, were removed, among the total three signboards installed on the rear side of the instant commercial building and the front side of the instant commercial building.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5 and Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 (including various numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Defendants asserted that they installed the Plaintiff’s signboard on the front of the instant commercial building at the Plaintiff’s request.

arrow