1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Fact-finding;

A. The Plaintiff is a lessee of the 3rd floor H, I and J (hereinafter “instant store”) among the buildings of “G” with the size of the F 8th floor located in Pakistan-si (hereinafter “instant building”), and operates an indoor screen golf practice hall with the trade name “K” in the said store.

B. Defendant C is an entity entrusted with the management of the instant building, which is an aggregate building, and is a management entity entrusted with the management of the instant building, where the instant building was leased five stories and operated with the trade name “M” (hereinafter “Defendant C”).

C. For the purpose of advertising the instant store, the Plaintiff set up protruding signboards in the third floor of the outer wall of the building in addition to installing signboards on the wall surface of the third floor of the outer wall of the building (hereinafter referred to as “protruding signboards”), and Defendant C set up protruding signboards for the purpose of advertising the Plaintiff’s protruding signboards on March 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the cause of the instant claim did not agree to replace the protruding signboard of the instant store with the signboards of the Defendant shop. The Defendant Company and the Defendant C removed the Plaintiff’s protruding signboard without permission and installed the protruding signboard on the same spot. The Defendants jointly and severally have the obligation to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 1,232,00,00 in total, KRW 10,945,000 in operating losses of the instant store due to a decrease in sales profit after protruding signboards (i.e., KRW 4,472,50 in total (i.e., KRW 4,472,50 in month x two months) and delay damages therefrom, and KRW 4,472,50 in monthly amount equivalent to the amount of operating losses from June 23, 2018 to the date the instant judgment is issued.

B. First of all, the Defendants stick out the instant store without the Plaintiff’s consent.