(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.08.17 2017나14683

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.08.17 2017나14683

약정금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2) below, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance

2. The second page 1-A of the judgment of the first instance.

The plaintiff and D served as the representative director of the CF from November 16, 2010 to August 26, 2013, and from August 26, 2013 to August 26, 2013.E served as the representative director of the CFF from November 16, 2010 to August 26, 2013." The plaintiff and D serve as the joint representative director of the CFF from August 26, 2013.

The 5th part of the second judgment of the court of first instance "Plaintiff A" at the bottom of the second judgment of the court of first instance shall be "Plaintiff A" and "Plaintiff D" shall be "D" respectively.

On the second page of the judgment of the first instance court, "the contract for construction work was concluded" is considered as "the contract was awarded for the construction work."

Part 4 of the decision of the first instance court is that "G has access roads" in Part 1 of the decision of the first instance is "64 square meters on access roads to the G".

In the fourth decision of the court of first instance, the term "inward union" in the 12th decision of the court of first instance shall be raised as "C Agricultural Association Corporation".

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "certificate" in Part 14 shall be raised to ", etc.".

The "land" in attached Form 1 of the 6th judgment of the first instance court shall be raised to "attached Form 2".

3. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.05.22 2013나9891

-서울남부지방법원 2015.11.12 2015나224

-서울고등법원 2019.08.22 2018누75100

-서울남부지방법원 2015.04.09 2014나11166

-대전지방법원 2015.11.18 2015나102987