A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On December 4, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on the 10-month imprisonment by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 12th day of the same month, and is still under the suspended sentence.

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 19, 2016, at around 00:30, the Defendant: (a) boarded D taxi operated by the victim C (57 years old) at a place where the address of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is unknown; and (b) continued to mean “Chewing A” without getting out of the normal distance of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (c) on the part of the victim, the victim’s destination was changed from the normal distance to the flood station; and (d) the victim, who was unsured, arrived at the F box located in the Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (d) the police officer affiliated with the F Police box, recommended the Defendant to pay a taxi fee, thereby obstructing the victim’s operation of the taxi by force, by force, by failing to get off the taxi within about 10 minutes, while doing so.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on March 19, 2016, on the ground that the police officer G, who was a police officer of the F police box affiliated with the F police box, did not pay a taxi fee and did not get off the vehicle despite having used a taxi operated by C before the F police box located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and that he was broken the Defendant.

“Prinking” and “Prinking,” and as a result, G had a defect in arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the course of interfering with his/her duties and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning criminal investigation and maintenance of public order and security by taking once the head of H’s police box attached to the above police box where G was drinking on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and C;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (A), investigation report (the previous conviction and confirmation of the suspect), and Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (the confirmation during the suspended period

1. Criminal facts;