A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire to “D” restaurant operated by the victim C on the ground that the victim did not properly respond to the victim’s horse at the “D” restaurant operated by the Plaintiff on the ground that the victim did not properly respond to the victim’s horse; (b) walked in the said restaurant in the new state; and (c) obstructed the victim’s affairs concerning the operation of the restaurant by force by avoiding disturbance over about 10 minutes of tobacco at the said restaurant, which is a gold-research station.

2. The Defendant insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim by putting the victim in a large voice called “the same year” among the ten customers, such as the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) and the statement in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Articles 314 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act: Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The observation of protection and the order to provide community service and attend lectures, Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection;