A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2017, from around 21:20 to 22:05, the Defendant left the restaurant of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Victim D (V, 53 years old), without any justifiable reason, and went out of the restaurant of "E", and went back to the place where the injured party is demanded to return home from the injured party, and returned back again, and made a hump to the victim a large dump, such as "in accordance with weather conditions", "the victim’s hump", and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 45 minutes, such as: (a) the victim’s assaulted the victim by drinking and drinking, preventing him from going to the customers or entering the restaurant; and (b) the victim interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement in F and D;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the defendant is pening in depth and the victim does not want the punishment);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act and the observation of protection;