logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.27 2015고단5283
자동차관리법위반
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this decision is published against the Defendants.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A operates a motor vehicle maintenance company of “F” in Seo-gu Incheon, and Defendant B is an employee of the said company, Defendant B should not dismantle any device prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Information and Communication of the national land without permission, such as the electronic device of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendants arbitrarily operated the ECU (electronic control device), which is the electrical and electronic device of vehicles, at the request of the drivers of the cargo vehicles or vans, dissatisfying the highest speed or output of the vehicle, and sentenced the clients to receive the price.

1. At around 12:45, May 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) requested the client G to raise the maximum speed of H cargo vehicles (former 4.5 tons of Kac Truck) from the client G; (b) connected the said cargo vehicle to the nit North Korea; and (c) dismantled an electronic control device that controls the state of the ECU vehicle’s engine, automatic transmission apparatus, and ABS DBS’s status by manipulating the electronic control device; and (c) dismantled the maximum speed limit of 90 km at the time of release; and (d) received KRW 2.50,00 in return, from around February 11, 2012 to April 8, 2014, the Defendant dismantled the electric and electronic device by receiving KRW 12,960,000 for a total of 38 times, such as the “crime 1” list.

2. On April 9, 2014, Defendant B, at the J company parking lot located in Gyeonggi Kimpo-si, Gyeonggi Kimpo-si, requested by the client to raise the maximum speed of LV at the client’s speed, and removed the electric and electronic device of a vehicle from July 19, 2013 to April 9, 2014, with a total of 13 times more than 3,660,000 won, including the case of “Attachment 2” of the attached Table 13, as the case of the “Attachment 2 of the Crime Day”, the Defendant connected the above cargo vehicle to the above cargo vehicle, dismantled the e-mail at the time of release by manipulating the e-mail data of the vehicle, and received 50,000 won in return.

Maz.

1. Judgment on the acquittal of Defendant A and his defense counsel

A. The Defendant’s summary of the assertion is November 8, 2013.

arrow