logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.12 2020나5814
손해배상(자)
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justifiable even if each evidence submitted in the court of first instance was presented in the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except for the additional determination under the following Paragraph (2).

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff paid KRW 3,025,190 in addition to the total amount from July 17, 2018 to March 27, 2020 for the purpose of treating the injury caused by the instant accident, such as operating expenses and medical expenses, etc., and filed a claim for the treatment costs.

In light of the fact that, according to the results of physical examination in the first instance trial, it was determined that the pelvis treatment was terminated, and that specific parts and details of the treatment are unclear, it is insufficient to recognize that only the written evidence Nos. 13 and 14, alleged by the Plaintiff, is a cost for the treatment of injury caused by the instant accident, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow