logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.09.10 2020고단1345
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name of “C” in his/her own Government-si B and 2.

1. From May 2019 to November 11, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) provided that: (a) the said business establishment received KRW 6-110,00 from an unspecified number of male customers, and had D, E, F, etc., a female of the Thailand, die with the body of customers as his/her hand, and had the married women engage in a similar sexual intercourse, and (b) paid KRW 25,00 to the female of the Thailand, by having the married women lose their sexual organ as his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic advertisements) at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, at the Internet site’s website “G” up to KRW 7-80,000 won of AOS(30 minutes of Maz. 30 minutes of Maz. 45 minutes of Maz. 45 minutes of Maz. Maz. 9-10,000 won of COS(30 minutes of Maz. 30 minutes of Maz. 10-110,00 won of DOS(45 minutes of Maz. 45 minutes of Maz. Maz. Maz. 45 minutes of Maz. Maz. Maz. 12-130,00 won of 7 hours of Maz. 5 hours of Maz. Maz.” The Defendant posted information on women’s body body, image or sexual traffic, etc.

3. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from October 1, 2019 to November 11, 2019, entered the said establishment as a visa exemption (B-1) and employed D, E, and F, a female of the Thailand who cannot work in the Republic of Korea, as an employee of sexual traffic.

As a result, the defendant has three foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

arrow