logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.14 2019고단6588
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor and fine of KRW 5,00,000 shall be imposed.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) committed acts of arranging sexual traffic (the act of arranging sexual traffic) with children of Defendant B, the Defendants, as well as those who run a marina business with the trade name “D” in Youngcheon-si, Chungcheongnam-do. Defendant A, via the Internet, intended to recruit female employees of the mother country who will work at the said marina business place, provide counseling services or pre-contract telephone, and Defendant B, while comprehensively managing the above marina business place, intended to act as a customer who would find the said marina business place.

Accordingly, from April 2, 2018 to January 29, 2019, the Defendants employed Thailand E and F as a female sexual traffic, and had the employees receive 3 to 50,000 won from the male customers to the unspecified number of male customers, and had them do sexual intercourse or similar intercourse.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities in the Republic of Korea;

Nevertheless, around November 12, 2018, the Defendants conspired to enter Korea as a tourist visa (B-1) in the foregoing “D,” and employed Thailand E with the nationality of Thailand who is not qualified to work in the Republic of Korea as an employee of the said marina business establishment. On November 27, 2018, the Defendants employed the F of Thailand nationality who entered Korea as a tourist visa (B-1) and did not have the qualification to work in the Republic of Korea as an employee of the said marina business establishment.

As a result, the Defendants employed foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. G statements;

1. Statement of police statement to F and E;

1. Business registration certificate and a list of 112 reported cases;

1.Each investigation report, internal investigation report, etc.

arrow