logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.04.02 2020고정77
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Although no person violates the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), the defendant operated a commercial sex acts establishment from June 21, 2019 to June 28, 201 with the trade name "C" from the 4th century-dong, Yongsan-gu to the 28th century, the defendant, while installing a shower room, 6 rooms equipped with toilets, two waiting rooms for the female sex acts, and advertised the said establishment to "D", which is an Internet commercial sex acts site, after having employed two female nationals of Thailand, to find the said place of business, and received 8 to 110,000 won as the price for sexual sex acts from an unspecified number of customers who have found in the said place of business, and caused the said women to have sexual intercourse with the said customers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

2. A person who violates the Medical Service Act is prohibited from establishing a massage place without being accredited by the competent authority. However, from June 21, 2019 to June 28, 2019, the Defendant established a massage place by having an unspecified number of customers who visited the said place of business receive the amount of 3 to 110,000 won from an unspecified number of customers who visited the said place of business and received the amount of money equivalent to 3 to 110,000 won, without being accredited as a massage operator at the said place of business from around June 21, 2019.

3. A person violating the Immigration Control Act shall not employ a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities. However, from June 21, 2019 to June 28, 2019, the Defendant employed the E (E, F, Female), G (G, H, female), I (I, and female) of the mother’s nationality in which he/she did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities while operating a commercial sex business establishment and a massage place as above, from around June 21, 2019 to the 28th of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, G, and I;

1. The police statement of K;

1. Accusation of a violator of the Immigration Control Act;

arrow