logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.08.08 2013고단1881
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around August 2008, the Defendant discovered that there was a disturbance, such as: (a) around August 2008, the Defendant discovered that there was a disturbance, such as: (b) the victim E, who was known in the D market located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, was using an extracted machine installed therein; (c) the Defendant, who was in possession of a flower, and (d) the victim was the victim.

Since then, around April 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim in front of the Dong office of Yannam 2, Dong office in Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, that “I will give treatment fees to the victim”, and that “I will give treatment fees to the victim, such as treatment expenses, transportation expenses, etc., 6.10,00 won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have been directly faced by the victim's camping net, and paid the operating expenses equivalent to KRW 20 million, and did not have performed the operation, and there was no plans to undergo the operation as well as to undergo the operation.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 6.10,00 from the victim as operating expenses around April 21, 2009, and acquired KRW 23,671,00 in total by the same method over 64 times from that time to June 21, 201, as stated in the attached crime list, by deceiving the victim as such, and acquired KRW 23,671,00 from that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including E statements);

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of statutes on the details of accounts of each bank and agricultural cooperative;

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts: Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the victim wants to punish the defendant and does not have any obligation to repay the damage; Article 347(1) thereof; Article 34 of the Criminal Act provides that it is not good to commit such crime by deceiving the victim who has been familiar with the victim for a long time. On the other hand, the defendant is guilty.

arrow