logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.16 2018고단1054
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for one year, each of the defendants B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 14, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and on October 24, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for forgery of securities, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and on September 23, 2015, Defendant A completed the execution of each of the above punishment at the Seoul East Eastern District Court.

[Criminal facts] The Defendants operated the business of operating the Crein Game Business Sales Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. (Representative Director A) in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

The Defendants, while being aware of the fact that a vending machine certification was obtained from the Game Water Management Committee for the type of the build-out game produced in the Dispute Resolution E and was not classified by the said Committee, the Defendants, even though they were aware of the fact that the said type of build-out game is to be operated or to be operated in the School Cleanup Zone, were willing to sell the type of build-out game using a false horse as if the said type of build-out game can be operated properly.

On November 2016, 2016, the Defendants: (a) the victim J and K introduced from the I Office operated by H in Daegu-gun G on H via H was registered as a vending machine by obtaining a patent due to coophone; (b) the Game Water Rating Board does not separately obtain permission from the Game Water Rating Board; and (c) it is possible to operate the business in the school Cleanup Zone.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the above-mentioned personal-class game was a game machine that was not classified as a rating by the Committee on the Management of Water-Class, and it was subject to control in the case of operating a game using the above-class game machine that was not classified as a rating, and it was not possible to operate a business using the above-type game machine in the school Cleanup Zone, and it was controlled several times on October 2016 by conducting a business using the above-type game machine.

In the end, the Defendants conspired to induce the victims as above and belong to them.

arrow