logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.03.09 2016고단4054
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an acting driver.

Around May 8, 2013, the Defendant was in bad credit standing around the time. Even if the Defendant borrowed the funds from purchasing machine extracted from the victim C, it was thought that most of the money would be used as living expenses, etc., and thus, the Defendant would have paid 10% of the monthly loan to the victim as profits or did not have any intent or ability to immediately return the principal when the victim demanded a refund.

I would like to install a machine by extracting money with the money.

I will pay 10% of the amount of money borrowed each month as proceeds.

If it is not possible to pay the monthly revenue, I will immediately refund the principal.

“Falsely speaking,” and its affiliation is written in the indictment of KRW 2 million around May 8, 2013 with the post office account (number D) in the name of the defendant from the injured party, but it appears to be a clerical error, as it appears to be a clerical error, the above correction shall be made ex officio.

On May 20, 2013, KRW 500,000,000 and KRW 18 million on July 9, 2013 were remitted.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim, and was remitted KRW 18 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A written protocol concerning the interrogation of a suspect against each part of the defendant by the prosecution (including all the part concerning the statement inC);

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. An investigation report (a counter investigation by a machine operator extracted from a person) (a counter investigation by the defendant and his defense counsel recognized the fact that the defendant made a statement to the victim as stated in the facts and the judgment that the defendant was in bad credit standing at the time, but at the time, he was capable of returning the principal to the defendant, used the money received from a person who was damaged by a machine extracted from a person from a person who was capable of using the machinery, but did not continue to run the business on the wind that he was subject to regulation, and the intention of deception and

arrow