logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.07.23 2013고단719
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for eight months, each of the defendants B.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From January 2013, the Defendants posted an advertisement that Defendant A purchased a Handphone and a Handphone on the Internet, posted an advertisement that “to purchase a Handphone and a Handphone.” The phone of the person who intends to sell the Handphone, set the place of the promise, carried the E-TG vehicle onto the place of promise, and Defendant A reported the network within the vehicle, and Defendant B confirmed whether the seller of the Handphone, which is a stolen object, directly talks with the seller of the Handphone, and then conspired to divide profits by acquiring the Handphone, which is a stolen object, to resell it to the intermediary, by paying the Handphone cost received from Defendant A.

1. At around 22:00 on February 18, 2013, the Defendants, despite being aware of the fact that the victim I’s market value was 9.60,000 won owned by H in front of the G Hospital located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, purchased 10,000 won of the price with the knowledge that the victim I was a stolen.

2. The Defendants, around 18:00 on December 24, 2013, purchased 200,000 won, knowing that they were stolen L from L in front of K stores located in the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentJ, and acquired ggal lusium 7,50,000 won, even though they were aware that they were stolen from L in front of K stores, the market price of the victim M was 8,50,000 won.

3. At around 02:30 on December 25, 2013, the Defendants: (a) purchased 200,000 won, even with knowledge of the fact that the Plaintiff’s market price owned by the victim P was about KRW 850,000,00,000, which was stolen by the winners of his/her name from his/her name in front and in front of the street, and acquired the stolen goods.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to acquire three smartphones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of police statements of I, M, and P;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to any protocol concerning suspect examination of L;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow