The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the case of misunderstanding of facts E, although the defendant was blicked in the victim E, the victim was not injured, and in the case of the victim F, the victim F was in the shape of the defendant's arms. However, this was merely occurred in the process of spreading the victim who was fighting, not intentionally blicking the victim, and the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of all the facts charged of this case by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence (700,000 won of fine) imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's lawfully adopted and investigated judgment on the part E of the victim, namely, the defendant himself/herself is also aware of the fact at the time of the victim E's her cream, and the police stated in the police that he/she was the victim's cream at the same time with the above victim's cream, the photograph taken by the victim includes the victim's fingers, etc., the victim's fingers, etc., in addition to the cream, and the police at the police at the time when the police at the time used the above victim's head and drinking, and stated that the victim's cream was damaged by assaulting the above victim by her head and drinking, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim E as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment below.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

(2) The following circumstances recognized by the lower court’s duly adopted and examined the part F of the victim F, namely, the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court and the record of trial, and the J at the same time assault the victim F by the Defendant’s head and drinking at the police station.