logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.10 2017고단2041
상해
Text

The accused shall announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. On February 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 12:30 on February 19, 2017, at the D amusement room parking lot located in the Dong-dong, Dae-gu, B, the Defendant: (b) ran the victim’s face at the victim’s face; (c) fluencing the victim’s body; (d) fluencing the victim’s son; and (e) flucing the victim’s bitch; and (e) flucing the victim’s bit

When “The victim’s face and the breast part of his breast were taken over as drinking while taking a bath, the victim was injured by the number of days of treatment, and the victim was scaming.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the records of the instant case, namely, the Defendant consistently asserted from the investigative agency to the present court that there is no time for the victim’s face, and the Defendant’s witnessing the scene at the time did not regard the victim’s drinking from this court to the point of view. However, the Defendant stated that the victimized person was assaulted by the police in accordance with the report processing list of 112.

In full view of the fact that the person who reported is not the victim but the defendant, it is difficult to believe that the victim's statement that the defendant was 10 times his/her face when taking the victim's face into consideration.

B. In relation to the fact of injury, the victim himself was assaulted by the defendant and her x-ray was marked to the hospital, and there was no particular error in the body, but did not receive medical treatment on the ground that there was no specific error in the body, and he was originally scambling, and he did not receive any specific treatment after he was scambling.

According to the fact-finding report about G dental clinic, the Defendant stated that “the degree of contribution to the injury is presumed to be beyond 10% of the cause of the death” in the death diagnosis report against the Defendant, but this is the Defendant.

arrow