A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2012, at around 19:00, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (53 years of age) such as the victim’s face, the victim’s face, and the head of the victim’s hair, etc. at around five weeks of treatment, on the ground that the victim E (53 years of age) expressed the Defendant’s father’s desire to take care of due to the distribution of compensation. The Defendant took care of the victim’s face, the victim’s face, the chest body, etc. at one time due to the right drinking, and took care of the victim’s head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes stated in an investigation report (as to attachment of the details of health insurance benefit to the victim E), investigation report (to hear the opinions of the plenary session of the Ulsan Military Medical Center that initially treated the victim), each investigation report (to report the confirmation of the general medical care of the victim E), and diagnosis report (to attach the statement of the police statement to the statement of the

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following factors of sentencing shall be taken into account):

1. Judgment on the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion regarding orders to provide community service and attend lectures

1. The summary of the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion is only one time, and there is no additional description of the victim's face or chest, and there is no other description of the victim's face or chest, thereby causing injury to the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case.

2. The following circumstances revealed in light of the evidence revealed prior to the judgment, namely, ① the Defendant was investigated by the police, and the Defendant deemed that there was two parts of the victim’s bones at the hospital. It is at the risk of the Defendant’s attention. However, it is difficult to recognize that the Defendant had five parts of the bones at the time, and that there was two parts of the bones of the bones of the Defendant.