A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On August 2012, the Defendant indicted the Defendant at the Defendant’s residence in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu (E) via the Internet, ordering 59.95 grams of EAM-2201, psychotropic drugs, and using his/her credit card (credit card number:F), thereby stating that the amount of 59.95 grams of EAM-2201 3gs of EAM-200(Korean equivalent to KRW 300,000) is 20 grams (Korean equivalent to KRW 300,000). However, according to evidence, it is clear that the amount is 59.9

(Investigation Records 70 pages, 94 pages). Around 12:25 September 2, 2012, an international registered mail sent from New Zealand (No. : RS0037948S1) was sent to the Incheon International Airport Postal Service Center located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, through 951 Part 951.

As above, the Defendant imported 3 grams equivalent to the EAM-2201.

2. On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the residence of the above Defendant on the first and second date, the EAM-2201, which was ordered as above, was not delivered to his/her own residence; (b) demanded a seller in non-name to re-delivery by telephone; and (c) on September 2012, the Defendant sent an amount equivalent to 3g of eAM-2201, contained in an international registered mail sent from a non-explosive area below New Zealand, to the eAM-201 Incheon International Airport Postal Service via an irregular flight.

As above, the Defendant imported 3 grams equivalent to the EAM-2201.

3. On October 2012, the Defendant administered the said Defendant’s residence at around 22:00, on the first and second anniversary of the date, in a manner of inserting the amount equivalent to eAM-22010.5g, carried under the same circumstance as the facts charged under paragraph (2) of the facts charged, and making it available together with water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. A report on detection;

1. Results of the analysis, reports on results of the analysis, additional reports on the results of the analysis, and replies to whether narcotics are narcotics;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 58 (1) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., for which relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment are applicable;