logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.06.14 2013고단1098
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. As to the facts charged, the Defendant had employees commit the following offenses. A.

C around August 12, 1993, around 16:54, the Korea Highway Corporation (Haw Line) loaded freight of 12 tons or more on the 2 axis of D vehicles, even though it is a restricted area in which the above roads cannot be operated more than 10 tons per stable.

B. At around 15:04 on May 15, 2002, E violated the restriction on the operation of 1.2 tons of cattle by loading and operating a wood of 11.2 tons on the 2 axis of F5 tons of car trucks even though he was unable to operate the road at the business office of Jung-do Highway Seoul Metropolitan Office.

C. On June 17, 2002, G around 22:26, around 2002, G was in violation of the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating a 11.33 tons of f5 tons of Kac Truck truck, which was loaded at the road above the Seoul Highway Corporation at a point of 406 kilometers in Busan, at the river in front of the Seoul Highway Corporation.

E on August 12, 2004: around 30, when driving a f5 tons car truck on the road on the 46 line of the national highway located in Chuncheon, in order to preserve the structure of the road and prevent the danger of traffic, E restricted the operation of vehicles exceeding the 40 tons of total weight, 10 tons of a stable, 4 meters of a width, 2.5 meters of a width, and 16.7 meters of a length, while it violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by carrying the 5 tons car truck with a load container loaded at the 3.0 meters of a width.

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to each of the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since each of the above facts charged constitutes a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow