logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.18 2014고단1766
대응되는 죄명 없음(2010.02.27 전환)등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A summary of the facts charged [2014 Highest 1766] The Defendant is a legal entity that is engaged in trucking transport business. A, an employee of the Defendant, driving a B truck with respect to the Defendant’s business, and operating a Seoul office on October 4, 1994 at a distance of 20.4km on the 17:46km of light-line 20.4km, and violated the restrictions on the operation of vehicles by a road management authority by loading more than 13.3 tons on the 2 axis of light-line 17:46 meters of light-line 20.

[2014 Highest 1769] The Defendant is a corporation that aims at trucking transport business. Around 17:42 August 3, 1993, the Defendant operated D Trucks with respect to the Defendant’s business and operated it in front of the Incheon Business Office, which is a point of 7.4km on the Gyeong Highway, which is a 7.4km point on the Gyeong Highway, on the 17:42th day of August 3, 1993, and violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority by loading and operating more than 11.2 tons on the 2.

2. On December 29, 201, the Constitutional Court ruled that Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jan. 1, 1995; Act No. 8416, Feb. 1, 201; Act No. 4977, Jan. 29, 200; Act No. 4855, Feb. 29, 201; Act No. 4977, Jan. 29, 200) that “if an agent, employee, or

Thus, since each of the above facts charged is not a crime, it is judged not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow