logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.19 2016구합13496
조치처분 무효확인등 청구의소
Text

1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. Measures taken by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on December 19, 2016 within the school.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is currently a DNA middle school student.

B. On November 28, 2016, both the Plaintiff and E filed a school violence report (hereinafter “instant report”) with the head of the DNA middle school life guidance department as follows (hereinafter “instant report”).

(No. 3) A.O. around May 2016, the Plaintiff sent back the back of E which the Plaintiff was seated in the first half of the first grade class class of D secondary school on one occasion, and around November 22, 2016, the Plaintiff sent the classroom up to the e’s book, and took a bath. At around November 11, 2016, E took a part of E’s back to the classroom, and in the process, the Plaintiff took part of E’s back to the classroom, and the process took part of E’s back to the classroom.

C. 1) On March 25, 2016, the Defendant constituting the instant autonomous committee constituted the instant autonomous committee (hereinafter referred to as the “instant autonomous committee”) comprised of nine persons following the D Middle School Violence Countermeasures Autonomy Committee (hereinafter referred to as “instant autonomous committee”).

The autonomous committee of this case was appointed or commissioned as a member (No. 1 evidence No. 1) (name No. 1). 2 G teachers of F 1 H 3 H 3 H 5 J 6 K 7 K 8 N 9 N 2). The autonomous committee of this case opened a meeting on December 7, 2016 when 7 members attend the meeting and reported the contents of this case to E and E, and decided to postpone the final decision due to lack of investigation (No. 7 evidence No. 2). The autonomous committee of this case decided to hold a meeting on December 15, 2016 and take measures under Article 17 (1) 3 (i) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence in Schools (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”) against the Plaintiff for the same reason as the contents of this case’s report, and (ii) take measures under Article 17 (1) 3 (3) (i) of the Educational Education Act’s special education at school under Article 5(3) of the same Act.

arrow