1. On June 20, 2017, the Defendant’s written apologys, the prohibition of return, and the disposition of taking four hours of special education and taking four hours of education.

Details of the disposition

The parties concerned are middle students attending the D secondary schools located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and the plaintiff B and C are the parents of the plaintiff.

On December 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) held a meeting with the autonomous committee on the grounds that Plaintiff A committed the following school violence (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (b) decided to take measures to prevent school violence (Article 17(1) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence (hereinafter “Act on the Prevention of School Violence”) against Plaintiff A (hereinafter “prior Resolution 3”); (c) in accordance with the written apology (Article 17(1) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence (hereinafter “Act on the Prevention of School Violence”), contact, intimidation, and retaliation (Article 17(1) against Plaintiff A (Article 17(1) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence (Article 17(1) of the Act on the Prevention of School Violence) (Article 3); and (d) the Defendant issued the instant prior Resolution to Plaintiff A on December 13, 2016 (Article 4(1) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence).

(A) At around 14:30 on November 30, 2016, Plaintiff A (first half of year 1) went beyond the same half-year bridge during the time when Plaintiff A 5-6 ricoin class of art activities during the free semester system.

F, G, H, and Plaintiff A returned to the class of the first-year class class and was playing in the public shape, and earth was over the boundary of F, G, H, and H, and G’s abundance. In this case, the earth was over the boundary of F, which was over the boundary of H, and it was over the cover of F.

At this time, G and H made F's bucks for drinking, and the F made it impossible for G, H, and H to prevent the Plaintiff and F students to report the thickness.

On December 29, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the instant preceding disposition with the Suwon District Court, and on May 2, 2017, the Suwon District Court was not the representative of parents elected at the parents meeting of the autonomous committee at the time of the instant preceding decision, i, J, and K were not the representatives of parents elected at the parents meeting of the parents or the parents representative meeting of the autonomous committee at the time of the instant preceding decision.