Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a third party vehicle.

On April 11, 2015, around 04:25, the Defendant driven the foregoing car prior to the luminous Mangymna road located in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, 230, and continued to run from the west-gu, west-do, to the ebbbal-distance ebbalon.

Since the place is where the passage of a vehicle is frequent, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by reducing the speed and driving on the front side of the vehicle on the part of a person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in operating the victim's E-Ba-si in the same direction due to the negligence of excessive operation, and received the back part of the victim's E-Ba-si taxi vehicle from the Defendant as the front part of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about 14 days, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the said taxi to the extent of KRW 437,110 in the back criminal repair cost, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as stopping and aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis on D;

1. Written estimate;

1. Answers to inquiries into facts by the head of Daegu Hospital annexed to the Daegu National University of Korea;

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident report, and a report on internal investigation (the confirmation of the driver of a marine vehicle);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of each on-site, the number of each damaged vehicle, photographs of each damaged vehicle, photographs of each damaged vehicle, photographs of each damaged vehicle, and photographs of each damaged vehicle;

1. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court regarding criminal facts under Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the fact of escape after occupational injury and injury, and the fact of escape after occupational injury, i.e., the victim went to the hospital on the date of the instant accident, according to the medical record at the time of the instant accident.