1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 12, 2015, the Defendant issued the instant disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s license as of June 9, 2015, on the ground that the Plaintiff, on April 11, 2015, 204:25, 200, e.g., the e., the front part of the Plaintiff’s front part of the front part of the Plaintiff’s front part of the e.g., the e., small-gu taxi driver in front of the e., the e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the

B. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a ruling dismissing the said claim on September 1, 2015.

【Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 15, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) misunderstanding of facts was also known to the victim’s mobile phone number, and the victim taxi of the said accident was limited to the extent of flicker’s flicking, but the taxi driver did not escape merely because he flicked a threat to flicking the Plaintiff’s car number plate after shooting the Plaintiff’s car number plate and demanding money.

나) 가벼운 접촉사고였고, 피해자는 사고 당시 멀쩡한 상태였으므로, 상해의 사실을 인식하지 못하였다. 2) 재량권 일탈남용 경미한 접촉 사고였던 점, 자동차보험처리가 된 점, 직업상 차량 운전이 필요한데 운전면허가 취소되면 업무를 제대로 볼 수가 없어 생계가 매우 어려워지는 점 등에 비추어 보면, 이 사건 처분은 너무 가혹하여 재량권 일탈남용에 해당한다.

B. The same factual basis is already established even if it is not bound by the fact-finding of a criminal trial in an administrative trial on the determination of mistake of facts.