1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. On February 10, 1993, the fact that the registration of transfer of ownership as stated in the purport of the claim (hereinafter “registration of this case”) has been made under the name of the defendant living together on March 9, 1993 on the ground of sale and purchase on the real estate of this case, which was originally registered in the name of the plaintiff, does not conflict between the parties.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion and determination are invalid, primarily by virtue of the bilateral title trust agreement between the original Defendant and the registration of this case in the name of the Defendant. The Plaintiff asserts that the registration of this case in the name of the Defendant was null and void, and as such, C, the mother of the original Defendant, has forged the documents required for registration and made it invalid. The Plaintiff

However, the evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 5-3 and the testimony of the witness D of the first instance court was entered into by the original Defendant with respect to the instant real estate.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since it is not sufficient to recognize that his mother C has forged the documents required for the registration of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.