beta
Cases
2014Do9463 A. Defamation
(b) Violation of Information and Communications Network Promotion Act;
(Defamation)
Defendant
1. A.
2. (a) B
Appellant
Prosecutor (In respect of Defendants)
Defense Counsel
C Law Firm
Attorney D, AY, AZ, Z, and BA (for the Defendants)
Judgment of the lower court
Suwon District Court Decision 2013Do4754 Decided June 26, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
January 29, 2015
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the grounds that there was no proof of the facts charged in the instant case.
Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, misapprehending the relevant legal principles
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Lee In-bok
Justices Kim Yong-deok
Justices Ko Young-han
Justices Kim Gin-young