A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 5, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon on the part of the Defendant for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On July 30, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court.

On May 9, 2017, the Defendant driven a balp motor vehicle with approximately 0.220% alcohol content among blood alcohol content at the section of approximately 10k away from the 10km away from the Hanuri-gun in the middle of the store in front of the store in the Dong of the Singu-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) and at the front of the road.

2. Around May 9, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or in the case of an accident) and the Road Traffic Act (or in the case of an accident) (or in the case of an accident) led the Defendant to drive a motor vehicle of this flurbed from the above Aflurg on the same day as the one-lane road in front of the mother church in the case of the Gu and Si/Gu, along with the two-lane road in front of the flurgian church in the case of Gu and Si/Gun.

At the time, the surface was dissat down due to the decline of the road at the time, and there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and to pay attention to safety as a driver of a motor vehicle, because he was the left-hand side of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as in paragraph 1, neglected it while under the influence of alcohol and stopped on the opposite road beyond the central line and stopped on the two-lanes, due to the negligence of driving without reducing speed, as in paragraph 1, the Defendant left the broom and stopped on the opposite road beyond the central line. Afterward, the Defendant, while driving at the right side of the Dworket other car driven by the injured party C (W, 48 years old) who driven at the first lane on the road, was flicked by the left side of the flurged car, followed the left side side of the flurged car, followed by the old U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. 40 years old) in front of the EF store, followed the Defendant’s G (n. S. f., 40 years old) who driven on the right side of the flurd vehicle on the right side side.

Ultimately, the Defendant is guilty of occupational negligence as above.