logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.23 2017나2044788
구상금
Text

1. Of the part against Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. in the judgment of the first instance, the following payments are ordered.

Reasons

1. As to this part of the basic facts, the corresponding part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance (from March 7 to 69 of the judgment of the court of first instance) shall be cited as the grounds of this judgment pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

However, part of the following shall be cut:

In the first instance judgment 5 to 11, the 5th 9th 11th 1st son of the vehicle in question seems to have been pushed ahead of the vehicle in the future with the said shock, and refluence of the vehicle in the lower part of the body (hereinafter “the second accident”). “The vehicle in question refluences the vehicle in the front and the lower part of the vehicle in question (hereinafter “the second accident”). From among the statements in subparagraph 2 E of the evidence No. 2, the expression “A, the driver of a fluoring vehicle, was plicked by a bridge under the road, and the fluor of the fluoring vehicle, was sicked by the driver of the fluoring vehicle in the second line, and the fluoring vehicle in the second line.” In other words, the driver of the vehicle in question, who was the final location at the site of the accident, was fluored by the driver of the vehicle in the second line and the driver of the fluoring vehicle in question.

2. The plaintiff's ground of claim

A. While the Plaintiff’s driver’s primary accident caused C’s death, the Plaintiff’s death is no responsibility for the death of H. In light of the instant accident circumstances, etc., the Plaintiff’s death was caused by the negligence of the driver of the Bosch Rexton vehicle.

B. On the other hand, C, a driver of a frighting vehicle, was negligent by neglecting the frighting vehicle in one lane by alone causing a prior accident. E, a driver of a frighting vehicle, is also negligent by neglecting the vehicle without taking any safety measure required under the Road Traffic Act, and thereby raising the risk of the accident.

On the instant accident, the driver's negligence and the driver's negligence of the motor vehicle.

arrow