1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the traffic accident occurred on September 28, 2014, as the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) driven by A, is a concurrent result between the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s fault, and sought reimbursement of KRW 21,856,122 out of the insurance money paid by the Defendant to the Defendant.

2. 사고 경위에 관한 인정사실 A은 2014. 9. 28. 18:00경 원고차량을 운전하고 부산 서구 D에 있는 E주차장 앞 편도4차로의 도로를 2차로를 따라 진행하다가 위 도로를 횡단하던 이륜자동차인 F 차량 이하 '피해차량')을 들이받았다. 위 사고의 충격으로 피해차량이 반대쪽 진행차로로 튕겨져 나가면서 편도2차로 중 1차로를 따라 진행하던 G 운전의 피고차량의 앞부분을 다시 들이받았다. 피고차량은 오른쪽으로 피하면서 급제동하였으나 피해차량이 그에 깔린 채 약 32m 가량 진행하면서 결국 운전자 H은 머리와 몸통 부위의 다발성 손상으로 18:10경 사망하고 말았다. [인정 근거 : 다툼 없는 사실, 갑2 내지 4, 6, 을1 내지 3 (가지번호 포함)

3. According to the facts found in the determination as to the negligence of the driver G, it is reasonable to view that the instant accident was caused by the negligence of the driver of the Plaintiff vehicle A, who did not avoid the shock with the damaged vehicle due to the negligence of H, who caused the driver of the damaged vehicle who driven the two-lane road while driving the two-lane vehicle without permission, neglected the duty of front-time care, etc., and caused the collision with the damaged vehicle.

Of course, H’s second shock with the Defendant’s vehicle would have a certain degree of impact on the death. However, in light of the process of causing the first shock with the Plaintiff’s vehicle expressed in the video of the evidence No. 1 and the time and location close between the process and the second shock, it is opposed to G as the Defendant’s driver.