logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.25 2018나17890
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as the parties and Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. are the insurers who concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract as listed below, and the Defendant is a mutual aid contractor who entered into a mutual aid agreement with the limited liability company on June 8, 2015 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) with respect to the A LFIS car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

The driver of the vehicle covered by the insurance shall be the driver of the vehicle, the plaintiff B bargaining vehicle CD vehicle, E Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Fexton vehicle G

B. On December 19, 2015, around 08:35, the occurrence of a traffic accident occurred. At the same time, the first and second drilling accidents, such as the attached site map in the vicinity of the Boyang-gun, Seoyang-gun, Seoyang-gun. An accident is a ice package of two lanes each speed of 80 km at a limited speed, and the site of an accident is a line of 1,346 meters in the direction of passing through the fences Eup in Gwangju Metropolitan City. The two-lanes of the road (one half-lane in the valley, two-lane in the direction of blocking, two-lane in the middle of the road). The two-lanes of the accident was installed at the center of the road, and the two-lanes of the road (one-lane in the middle of the road, two-lane in the middle of the road). The two-lanes of the accident was installed at the center of the road, and the two-lanes of the accident, and the two-lanes of the road.

b) E is a vehicle one-lane after a frighting vehicle at the later end of about 50 meters, while driving the frighting vehicle (on the frighting vehicle: J and K) and driving on the frighting vehicle.

arrow