Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.
provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2014 Highest 4486"
1. Defendant A
A. Notwithstanding the fact that Defendant A is not a narcotics handler, Defendant A dealt with the following psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related camblopon (hereinafter “camlopon”).
1) On January 2014, 2014, Defendant A received approximately one gram of phiphone from F and received it from E main points located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Seoul, on February 2, 2014, Defendant A purchased phiphones from F and gave and receive approximately one gram of phiphones. (2) On February 2, 2014, Defendant A purchased phiphones around the E main building located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, for the purchase price of phiphones, purchased approximately 50,00 won from F and one gram of phiphones. (b) around March 2014, Defendant A purchased phiphones from F and obtained approximately 500,000 won of phiphones. (2) Defendant A accepted F’s loan from B in lieu of the purchase price of phiphones.
Accordingly, around March 2014, Defendant A purchased approximately one gram from F on the street in front of the Glimmomo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, for the purchase of approximately 500,000 won on behalf of F to B after receiving approximately one gram of philopon from F.
C) On April 2014, 2014, Defendant A purchased Rophonephones on the first day of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 2014, 201, after receiving approximately KRW 200,000 from his female to F as the price for the purchase of laphones, Defendant A purchased 1g of laphones from her female on the first day of the first day of the Han Bank located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 2014, Defendant A received approximately KRW 200,000 from her female on the first day of the first day of the Han-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the street bank, and issued KRW 20,000 from her female on the part of the price for the purchase of laphones.
Defendant
A, when receiving a claim from F that “Wonopon price is too low,” a bank as of the same day.