beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 18, 2015, the Defendant against the victim B, who was operating a travelman in a Buddhist area, received a request from the victim B to “a request from the victim B to seek a total of 150 pages of “Tet 30 public performance pockets on August 8, 9, and D public performance pockets 75.”
It stated that the above number of private persons referred to as "remitt money should be promptly transferred to the E side of the E, so that it can be transferred to the internal account."
However, even if the defendant received the above money, he was trying to use it as personal entertainment expenses and living expenses, etc., but did not actually secure tweets or have no intention or ability to purchase tweets by remitting it to his employees.
Nevertheless, Defendant 2’s false statement, deceiving the victim, and deceiving the victim, and as such, “2,970,250 won” of the facts charged in the amount of KRW 2,970,00 on the same day as the tweet price is a clerical error. Thus, Defendant 2 ex officio corrected it to “2,970,000 won” and accordingly corrected the total amount.
26. 8,250,000 won for the same month, and for the same year
7.7. 495,000 won, 1,100,000 won on the same day, respectively, were remitted to the SC Bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant, and acquired a total of KRW 12,815,000.
2. On July 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) contacted the victim, who is a hotel operator, at a closed space; and (b) asked the victim, to make up for the reservation of the hotel by French tourists at the H tourr operated by B.
“In doing so as to attract the said tourists to a hotel operated by the victimized person,” the said tourists stated that “this tourists are coming from the arche and pande-out of Korea, and now, they cannot immediately transfer in the present Section, because they cannot transfer to the Republic of Korea the tampet expenses. 3 days after the day, they will immediately refund to Seoul.”
However, even if the defendant received the above money, he tried to use it as personal entertainment expenses and living expenses.