logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2013.07.03 2013고단168
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny;

A. On April 15, 2013, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with D Company dormitory 203 located in Daegu-gun Co., Ltd. with the victim E by using the gaps in the victim E; (b) one gallon jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus ju

B. At around 15:00 on May 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if the Victim G in the Gumi Si F would purchase Oral Ba in his commercial area; and (b) was examining Oral Ba, the Defendant: (c) committed a theft by 250c “Mac” 1,50c, which was set up in the front of the commercial area with no number plate equivalent to KRW 1,500,000 in the market price of the victim G, which was set up in the front of the commercial area.

2. Fraud or violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. On April 15, 2013, the Defendant purchased goods, such as tobacco, at the convenience store operated by the victim J in Daegu-gu, on April 22:23, 2013, at the convenience store operated by the victim J in Daegu-gu, and offered the stolen e-mail card as a means of payment, as in paragraph 1(a), to an employee in the name of the Defendant, who was a legitimate holder, and had the Defendant prepare the sales slip as if he were the legitimate holder, and issued the stolen e-mail card to the said employee, and then unlawfully uses the stolen e-mail card, and received goods, such as tobacco, equivalent to the aggregate amount of KRW 10,800, from the said employee who believed the Defendant E

B. On April 15, 2013, the following day after the lapse of 22:59 and 00:29, the Defendant paid KRW 7.20,000,000 to the NE L L, a total of twice via alcohol, singing, etc., from the NE L, which was operated by the victim M, the Defendant, as in paragraph 1(a), and issued the sales slips arbitrarily signed to the said employee by allowing the Defendant to prepare the sales slips by presenting it to the employee under his/her name as if the Defendant was a legitimate holder.

arrow