logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 06. 28. 선고 2016두37140 판결
(심리불속행)원고가 단순경비율 적용 대상인지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-58500 ( October 17, 2016)

Title

(C) Whether the plaintiff is subject to the application of the simple expense rate

Summary

(In the first instance), the summary of the Income Tax Act adopts the individual taxation principle, and the simple expense rate constitutes an exception to the applicable taxation, so there is no reason to expand the applicable application in violation of the law.

Related statutes

Article 17-2 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du37140 Decided global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

6.28

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow