logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 07. 14. 선고 2016두37133 판결
(심리불속행)상속재산을 유사매매사례가액으로 평가한 것은 정당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu3976 ( October 17, 2016)

Title

(D) It is reasonable to evaluate the inherited property as a similar sale price.

Summary

(H) If it is deemed that there are no extraordinary circumstances to change the price from the evaluation date even during a period that does not fall under the evaluation period, the price of the relevant transaction, etc. may be included in any of the following values, subject to consultation by the Evaluation Review Committee:

Related statutes

Article 60 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act:

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du37133

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ ○

Defendant-Appellee

The director of the tax office.

Judgment of the lower court

March 17, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

July 14, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal do not include the grounds provided in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal of Supreme Court or are without merit. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the Act.

arrow