A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 17, 2014, at 02:49, the Defendant was under influence on the center line of the Saemaeul-distance Intersection of 175 Saemaeul-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant arrived at the B district zone located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-dong Police Station B (the age of 56) according to the traffic accident prevention and protective measures under C (the age of 56) of the victim, Daegu-dong Police Station B, which was dispatched upon receipt of a report.

On June 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00 on June 17, 2014, caused the victim to sit in the conference room; (b) thereby, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the Plaintiff’s cryp, flap, fump fump, fump fump fump fump fump fump fump fump? hump fump fump fump fump fump fump fump fump; and (c) the Defendant

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on protective measures, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Place of service;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (a person who is specially mitigated) (a person subject to mitigation) / Cases of minor injury (a person subject to special mitigation) / Cases of obstruction of performance of official duties / In the case of obstruction of performance of official duties / not only the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers, but also the defendant's injury to police officers and the nature of the crime is not good, and there are records of criminal punishment for violent crimes. However, there are major circumstances such as the extent of damage is minor, the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected, and the motive, background, means and method of the crime of this case, the situation before and after the crime, and other circumstances of this case.