1. Each monetary loan agreement concluded on May 9, 2016 and May 13, 2016 by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The part concerning the loan of this case among the principal claim and counterclaim claim

A. The Plaintiff was a company that develops and supplies real estate and was employed by the Defendant.

The Defendant, on May 9, 2016, lent to the Plaintiff KRW 80 million, and KRW 130 million on May 13, 2016, without fixing the due date for repayment (hereinafter “instant loan”), and there was money transaction between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as follows.

The Plaintiff (won) asserted that the Plaintiff (won)’s loans 2016-05-09 80,000,000, non-party loans 2016-05-130,000,000 separate loans 2016-08-12,000,000, 2016-28-28,000, 2000 loans 2016-09-09 1,300,000, 2016-194,000,000 loans 2016-09-194,000,000, 2016-29-1,300,000 loans 1,000,000-6,000-1,000,000-6,000 or more of loans 201-16,300,001-16,0030-1,06.

As a result of the fact-finding conducted by the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Agency, it is recognized that the person was a salary in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, and the fact-finding conducted by the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Agency.

No dispute over loan repayment 2017-013 2,00,000 separate loans 2017-01-23 2,000,000, 113,025 separate loans 2017-02-28,500,025 separate loans 2017-02-02,50,0007 16,500,000 loans 2017-02-16,300,000 loans 2017-2-16, 300,000-23,00,000,000, 228,613,025,42,000,000 loan loans / [applicable], Gap’s evidence 2-1, 24-2, 51 through 31, 31-14, 15-14, 31-7, and 31-5 of the evidence of the court Gap’s evidence.

B. A summary of the parties’ assertion 1, the Defendant agreed to the interest rate of 20% per annum at the time of the instant lending.

2.