Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, as to the Defendants, the two-year period from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 20, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 million for the crime of acquiring stolen goods by the Seoul Southern District Court.
Defendant
B On December 3, 2012, the order of summary amounting to KRW 2 million was issued by the Jyyang Branch of the Do Government District Court on December 3, 2012, and the summary order of KRW 3 million was issued by the Seoul Central District Court on July 10, 2013 as the charge of the acquisition of stolen goods.
2. A around April 11, 2015, Defendant A purchased stolen goods from H before Defendant A’s house located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by purchasing KRW 300,000,000 of the market value of the victim I, the victim I, who stolen the taxi from H, in front of Defendant A’s house located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
Defendant
A, in addition to this, from July 28, 2012 to May 11, 2015, from around July 28, 2015 to around 11, 2015, purchased approximately KRW 32,010,000,00 in total of 114 times from H, such as the daily list of crimes (1) in attached Form B, and acquired habitually stolen goods by purchasing approximately KRW 172,00,000 in total amount of KRW 171,00,000.
3. Defendant B knew that A purchases a cell phone device, which is a stolen from H, etc., such as the weather table (1) in attached crimes, and, within a week after acquiring a cell phone device, Defendant B attempted to re-purchase approximately KRW 300,000 per unit of a cell phone device, which is a stolen object, from A.
Accordingly, around November 2013, Defendant B acquired stolen goods by paying approximately KRW 300,000 per unit of a mobile phone device to A around the new road of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and from H who delivered the cell phone device, which is a stolen object, upon A’s request, knowing that it is the 7 cost of the mobile phone terminal, and around that time.
Defendant
B In addition, from around that time to May 9, 2015, A purchases approximately KRW 13,50,000, total sum of 45 mobile phone terminals from A 15 times, such as the table of crimes (2) in attached Table 1.