Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, at the Incheon District Court on May 28, 2014, sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (or a measure not to be taken after an accident).

6.6 The judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On February 22, 2014, at around 05:30, the Defendant: (a) driven a B 130-car while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.104% without obtaining a driver’s license from the 1km section of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government up to about 05:46 on the same day from the day before the mutual influent drinking house located in the non-luminous operation of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) around 05:46 on the same day.

2. On February 22, 2014, at around 05:46, the Defendant: (a) was found to have driven a motor vehicle of Eunpyeong-ro 10-1, the front day of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is owned by the Defendant, while driving the motor vehicle of Eunpyeong-ro 6-1, and was asked to submit a driver’s license by the Seoul Western Police Station Guard Guard Guard and the traffic safety department C.

The defendant, who is a public document in possession, presented the defendant's driver's license in the name of the head of Seoul Police Agency D, which is a public document, as if the defendant was the defendant's driver's license.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (2) above, prepared a master-user report using a portable information terminal (PDA) from the Seoul Western Police Station Guard Guard Guard, and from C in the process of the traffic safety system, and demanded the Defendant to sign the master-user report, the Defendant forged the driver’s name column in the name of D, which is a prior recording of the certificate of fact, with the intention of making the driver’s signature in the driver’s signature column and causing the driver’s signature to handle the affairs. The Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (2) above, had C, who is not aware of the fact, transmitted the above prior record via the internal computer network of the police

4. The defendant shall be entitled to forge private documents and uttering private documents.