A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Criminal facts

Defendant with separate Co-Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “B”),

1. At around 23:00 as of August 23, 2012, at the construction site of the gas station located in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu, Seoul, the Defendants are carrying together the cargo vehicle of the F1t Poter, the sum of which is equivalent to the market value of KRW 890,000, such as 60, 720,000, and 170,000, 20, the market value of which is the 170,000, and 20, the 170,000, 20, 200,

2. On September 23:00 early September 2012, 201, at the construction site of the He Center in front of the G Apartment-si G in the following City: (a) 40,000, in the same manner as the above paragraph (a), have the 800,000,000 won of the market price managed by the victim I;

3. At 23:00 on September 23, 2012, with articles equivalent to the aggregate of 327,000 won in the market value, such as 60 flow pumps equivalent to 102,00 won in the market value managed by the Victim K at Dunju-gun Jlllle, and 225,000 won in the market value, in the same manner as the above paragraph (a);

4. From September 25, 2012, around 23:30 on September 25, 2012, at the construction site of the Pacific City L, cut iron bars that were in possession of a cut-house in advance at the construction site of the Pacific farm, and carried 85 large-scale 80,000 won at the market price managed by the victim M in the same manner as the above paragraph (a).

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property more than four times together with B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the accused and B in the third protocol of trial;

1. Each police statement of M and E;

1. A written statement I and K;

1. Records and lists of police seizure;

1. Application of each investigation report and evidential materials attached thereto to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code for discretionary mitigation (the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was passively involved in the crime in this case) is examined, and the defendant appeared in this court.