logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.15 2018고단2733
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power” On September 3, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site, and completed the execution of the above sentence on July 1, 2016. On January 31, 2018, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court’s imprisonment on September 14, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】 around December 14:00 on December 6, 2017, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in the Seoul Southern District Court No. 308, the Seoul Southern District Court No. 308, which was located in Yangcheon-gu, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the instant case in violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence).

At that time, the defendant answers to the prosecutor's question, "I do not have any such fact", "I have to answer to the prosecutor's question, "I have the fact that the witness had 0.05g g of C-Wlopon," and answer to the prosecutor's question, "I have the fact that the witness has paid sons containing 0.05g of oponon," and "I have no fact" to the policeman during February 2017, the witness answers to the attorney's question, "I have no fact that there was a fact that the witness supplied oponon to C", and answer to the attorney's question, "I have no fact that there was a fact that there was a fact that there was a fact that the opon was supplied to C during the same period."

However, on February 2017, the Defendant provided a single philophone with approximately 0.05g philophones to B and C in the vicinity of the Defendant’s residence located in the D's building E located in the middle of Pakistan-si.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and F;

1. Some statements made by the police and the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution concerning B;

1. Recording notes (recording notes of witness A) and recording notes in relation to C;

arrow