logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.07.10 2019고정96
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2017, the Defendant appeared at the court of Changwon District Court 218, Changwon District Court 669, Changwon District Court 2017Kadan1213 B, and testified as a witness in the special injury case against Changwon District Court 2017 Gowon District Court 1213 B, despite the Defendant’s failure to properly do so, the Defendant responded to the attorney’s question, “In the process of fluoring, this pipe did not contact the other party’s body,” and “I asked the counsel, “I see,” “I see,” and “I see,” “I see,” “I am any sound or any other person’s body at the time of fluoring on the ground at the time of fluoring on the ground.”

Accordingly, the defendant gave false testimony contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Recording notes (the accused, C, or D legal statement);

1. Statement of the police with respect to C and D;

1. Photographs, internal investigation report, and medical certificate;

1. The video of the case;

1. Application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines) (In full view of each of the above evidence, it may be sufficiently recognized that the contents of the defendant's statement are not consistent with objective facts, and that the defendant makes a false statement against his memory, and that the defendant has made a false statement against his memory)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Strict measures are required to cope with crimes related to the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, as the State's judicial functions are likely to be significantly damaged.

The details of the statement made by the defendant as a witness and the part assessed as perjury, the circumstances of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow