The defendant shall be innocent.

On January 13, 2015, around 15:40, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the fraud case with respect to Chuncheon District Court Heading 301, which is located in 149, as a viewing-ro 149.

The defendant sent to the defense counsel's question "I did not take place any such documents as a contract, etc., which he brought to the defendant." The defendant sent to the respondent's question "I did not have any direct contract, etc.... I did not appear." The prosecutor's "E or F had shown a sales contract with the content that the defendants purchased the land at the G coffee shop at the time, with the fact that I had no fact that I had sold the land at the time," and again asked the prosecutor's "I had no answer to the purport that I had no answer to the effect that I had not presented the contract 4.3 million won contract," "I had no answer to the effect that I had no answer to the effect that I had no answer to the fact that there was no fact that the defendants presented the contract to E," and the prosecutor's answer again to the purport that "I had no answer to the effect that I had no answer to the fact that I had no answer to what I had to purchase the land at the time."

However, on October 2013, the Defendant directly observed that C shows the above contract to E and F in the first place with C, D, E, and F in the G's neighboring coffee shop at the first place in the Hoju-si.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Judgment

1. In order to recognize a witness’s statement as a perjury, it is proved that the content of the statement is beyond reasonable doubt as to the fact that it goes against the witness’s memory.