beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, by imprisonment of April, by Defendant B, by a fine of KRW 2 million, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B, C, and D worked as the head of G department from around December 2012, Defendant B had been in charge of the overall construction work, including cost management, process management, and safety management, for an agent at the construction site at the construction site of the original H apartment construction site, performed by the said company. Defendant C has been in charge of the overall supervisor at the construction site of the said apartment construction site while serving in the office of I as an architect.
Defendant
B and C, around April 25, 2012, after receiving a letter of “plan to check the actual execution of construction works in May 2012” from the J, Defendant D through Defendant D to issue money in relation to the check of the actual execution status to a public official A who belongs to the J, one of the inspection team members of the above execution status, in order to not be pointed out during the execution status.
Then, around April 27, 2012, Defendant B delivered KRW 3 million in cash to Defendant C at the H Housing Site Office at Hoju-si, Seoul, and Defendant C delivered KRW 3 million in cash to Defendant D, stating that the delivery of KRW 3 million in cash to Defendant D from “K” located in Daejeon Peong-gu, on April 28, 2012.
Since then, around 08:50 on April 28, 2012, Defendant D discussed to the effect that D, who was on a SM5 car at the above K parking lot, had a chief door opened and delivered the said three million won, Defendant D expressed to other A, who is listed on the said car, less pointed out the point of the inspection of actual condition of “the construction site of the original HoH apartment” on the “the construction site of the original HoH apartment.”
As a result, the Defendants conspired to make the above solicitation to the above A, and delivered cash of KRW 3 million under the pretext of the honorariums to give a bribe in connection with the duties of public officials.
2. On April 28, 2012, around 08:50 on April 28, 2012, the Defendant received a bribe of KRW 3 million in cash as a reward in the above “K” parking lot and received a bribe in relation to his/her duties as a public official affiliated with the J.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of the defendant A, B, and C;
1. Defendant D.