beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of April and fine of KRW 3,000,000, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a public official in charge of the affairs such as reporting on food service businesses and administrative disposition, etc., who works for the Fgu Office Environmental Sanitation Department.
On June 3, 2013, the Defendant received a request from C, the husband of the “H” business owner I, who was discovered as food materials stored in the F-gu environmental sanitation department office located in Busan G, and received a cash reward of KRW 300,000,000,000 from the Defendant.
The request contains food materials with the expiration of the period of circulation.
As to the detection of the penalty surcharge, the suspension of business was imposed instead of the penalty surcharge, and the suspension period was changed to the end.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.
B. On June 10, 2013, the Defendant received a request from “J” restaurant business owner B, who was discovered by the storage of transitional products in the foregoing F-gu Office’s environmental sanitation department office, and received KRW 1 million in cash under the pretext of the reward.
The request contains food materials with the expiration of the period of circulation B.
As to the detection of the penalty surcharge, the disposition of business suspension is imposed instead of the penalty surcharge, and the control was not imposed during the period of the suspension.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.
2. The defendant C is the defendant 1-A.
At the same time, at the same place as the paragraph, A made the above solicitation and delivered cash of KRW 300,000 under the pretext of the honorarium to give a bribe to public officials in relation to their duties.
3. Defendant B’s Defendant 1-B
At the same time, at the same place as the paragraph, A made a request as above, and delivered a cash of one million won under the pretext of the honorarium to A to give a bribe in relation to the public official's duties.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each prior notice of disposition, and the application of each report statute;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment: The party chosen to imprisonment under Article 129 (1) of the Criminal Act;