1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 4, 2003, the Plaintiff joined B Co., Ltd., and worked as a Kamra process studal in semiconductor C business place, etc., and retired on February 28, 2005.

B. The Plaintiff, around June 2008, she dried up with the left arms and legs, and kidding down with the fright, and was diagnosed with the diversity typosis at the Seoul Asan Hospital.

C. On July 1, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits for multi-dispactivity, but the Defendant, on April 12, 201, did not approve the application on the ground that the cause of the outbreak of multi-dispactivity infection is unclear, the period of service is shorter, and the degree of exposure to organic solvents is not confirmed and proximate causal relation with his/her duties is not recognized.

(hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case") d.

The Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a petition for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but was dismissed on January 17, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence No. 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. From February 4, 2003, the Plaintiff’s assertion was exposed to organic solvents such as a Kaphra, etc. (PR amount) while working as a Kaphra, etc. at B semiconductor C’s business establishment. The Plaintiff’s injury and disease is recognized as a proximate causal relation with his duties, since frequent shift work led to overwork and stress.

Nevertheless, the defendant's disposition of this case on a different premise is unlawful.

B. Facts of recognition 1) The work in charge, work contents, and working hours of the Plaintiff, who became a stock company B on February 4, 2003, worked as an off-cer, etc. from the Kamra in semiconductor C, and retired on February 28, 2005. The Plaintiff chemical or physically retires from February 28, 2003 to the main work (CMP process wafers generated in the process of processing wafers).