1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 24, 1995, the Plaintiff joined Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Masung Electronic”) and worked as a production-based luctor in the business division of the Plaintiff, which became a producer, from the LROM business division (divided into Samsung Digital Co., Ltd., Apr. 3, 2012) and the sprinks and the sprinks, and set off on July 31, 2001.

B. After the retirement of the Plaintiff, on October 6, 2005, the Plaintiff diagnosed the cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spy (hereinafter “the instant disease”) and was subject to the cerebral cerebral Spy on October 19, 2005, and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on March 24, 2009.

C. On January 15, 2010, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition that rejected the Plaintiff’s application on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant shopping branch and the Plaintiff’s business.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was health at the time of Samsung Electronic Admission and did not drink or smoke.

There is no family history of the instant disease.

However, while working as a production luctor in Samsung Electronic, it was exposed to harmful substances such as lead, luculos, organic solvents (procoppy alcohol, hyton) for a long time.

The Plaintiff’s disease was caused by exposure to the above harmful substances.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff was engaged in night work and shift work, which can disrupt the physiological rhythm in Samsung Electronic, and such form of work can also develop or promote the instant disease.

Therefore, even though the disease of this case was related to the plaintiff's work, the disposition of this case on different premise is unlawful.

(b) Fact-finding 1) The process of manufacturing LROM’s business and the Plaintiff’s business contents can be expressed as TFT exray process, TFT (Thin Ftiltistor, or LWWingman’s license to deliver or block signals to the liquid.